Film vs digital, a year later

Film vs digital, a year later

I shot only film for twelve months. What I miss, what I don't, and what it cost.

The experiment started as a way to slow down. Thirty-six frames per roll forces you to decide before you press the shutter, not afterwards on the screen.

What I kept

What I dropped

Developing colour at home. It is possible, but temperature control in a small kitchen is a battle I lost more often than I won.

Cost

Around 70 rolls over the year. Film, development and scans came to roughly the price of a mid-range lens.

← Back to the journal